DATASHEET · SIDE BY SIDE
Bambu Lab PAHT-CF vs Polymaker PolyMide CoPA
From the Bambu Lab PAHT-CF review: CoPA is unfilled and far tougher under impact; PAHT-CF is the stiffer, more dimensionally stable choice for parts under sustained load.
Measured wins
| Spec | Bambu Lab PAHT-CF | Polymaker PolyMide CoPA |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Material | Nylon | Nylon |
| Manufacturer | Bambu Lab | Polymaker |
| Diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Thermal | ||
| Print temp | 260 to 290°C | 250 to 270°C |
| Bed temp | 80 to 100°C | 25 to 50°C |
| Warping | medium | medium |
| Quality | ||
| Layer adhesion | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Bed adhesion | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Stringing resistance | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Verdict | ||
| Overall rating | 4.2/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Price / kg | — | — |
How they differ on the data
Bambu Lab PAHT-CF runs 15°C hotter on the nozzle (window midpoints 275°C and 260°C), and the two windows share 10°C of range, so one profile can cover both. Bambu Lab PAHT-CF lists the wider window (30°C against 20°C). Bambu Lab PAHT-CF runs 52°C hotter on the bed (window midpoints 90°C and 38°C), and the windows do not overlap, so each needs its own profile. Polymaker PolyMide CoPA lists the wider window (25°C against 20°C).
Which one for the job
Pick Bambu Lab PAHT-CF for mechanical parts, automotive.
Pick Polymaker PolyMide CoPA for gears, mechanical.