filament.swatchThe Workbench Reference
DATASHEET · SIDE BY SIDE

NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU vs SUNLU TPU 95A

From the NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU review: SUNLU TPU 95A is firmer, faster, and far easier to feed; NinjaFlex is much softer and more rubber-like for gaskets and wearables that need genuine squish.

From the SUNLU TPU 95A review: NinjaFlex is much softer and more rubber-like but slow and fussy; SUNLU TPU 95A is firmer, faster, far easier to feed, and a fraction of the price.

NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU NinjaTek · TPU
★ Best overall SUNLU TPU 95A SUNLU · TPU
Measured wins
NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU: 0 SUNLU TPU 95A: 2
Spec NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPUSUNLU TPU 95A
Overview
Material TPU TPU
Manufacturer NinjaTek SUNLU
Diameter 1.75 mm 1.75 mm
Thermal
Print temp 225 to 235°C 210 to 230°C
Bed temp 20 to 40°C 50 to 60°C
Warping none low
Quality
Layer adhesion 5/5 5/5
Bed adhesion 4/5 4/5
Stringing resistance 2/5 3/5
Verdict
Overall rating 4.2/5 4.3/5
Price / kg — —

How they differ on the data

NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU runs 10°C hotter on the nozzle (window midpoints 230°C and 220°C), and the two windows share 5°C of range, so one profile can cover both. SUNLU TPU 95A lists the wider window (20°C against 10°C). SUNLU TPU 95A runs 25°C hotter on the bed (window midpoints 30°C and 55°C), and the windows do not overlap, so each needs its own profile. NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU lists the wider window (20°C against 10°C).

NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU ships on a 0.5 kg spool and SUNLU TPU 95A on 1 kg, so compare price per kilogram rather than per spool.

Which one for the job

Pick NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU for wearables, vibration damping.

Pick SUNLU TPU 95A for phone cases, functional parts.