Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF vs NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU
From the Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF review: NinjaFlex at 85A is far softer and far fussier. Start with a 95A like this one unless you specifically need the extra squish.
| Spec | Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF | NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Material | TPU | TPU |
| Manufacturer | Bambu Lab | NinjaTek |
| Diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Thermal | ||
| Print temp | 220 to 240°C | 225 to 235°C |
| Bed temp | 30 to 60°C | 20 to 40°C |
| Warping | none | none |
| Quality | ||
| Layer adhesion | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Bed adhesion | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Stringing resistance | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| Verdict | ||
| Overall rating | 4.4/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Price / kg | — | — |
How they differ on the data
Nozzle windows are centered on the same temperature (230°C), and the two windows share 10°C of range, so one profile can cover both. Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF lists the wider window (20°C against 10°C). Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF runs 15°C hotter on the bed (window midpoints 45°C and 30°C), and the two windows share 10°C of range, so one profile can cover both. Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF lists the wider window (30°C against 20°C).
Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF ships on a 1 kg spool and NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU on 0.5 kg, so compare price per kilogram rather than per spool.
Which one for the job
Pick Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF for flexible parts, phone cases.
Pick NinjaTek NinjaFlex TPU for wearables, vibration damping.