DATASHEET · SIDE BY SIDE
Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF vs Polymaker PolyFlex TPU95
From the Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF review: PolyFlex TPU95 is the printer-agnostic standard and slightly cheaper per kilo; the Bambu HF version prints considerably faster and feeds through an AMS.
Measured wins
| Spec | Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF | Polymaker PolyFlex TPU95 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Material | TPU | TPU |
| Manufacturer | Bambu Lab | Polymaker |
| Diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Thermal | ||
| Print temp | 220 to 240°C | 210 to 230°C |
| Bed temp | 30 to 60°C | 25 to 60°C |
| Warping | none | none |
| Quality | ||
| Layer adhesion | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Bed adhesion | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Stringing resistance | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Verdict | ||
| Overall rating | 4.4/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Price / kg | — | — |
How they differ on the data
Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF runs 10°C hotter on the nozzle (window midpoints 230°C and 220°C), and the two windows share 10°C of range, so one profile can cover both. Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF runs 2°C hotter on the bed (window midpoints 45°C and 43°C), and the two windows share 30°C of range, so one profile can cover both. Polymaker PolyFlex TPU95 lists the wider window (35°C against 30°C).
Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF ships on a 1 kg spool and Polymaker PolyFlex TPU95 on 0.75 kg, so compare price per kilogram rather than per spool.