DATASHEET · SIDE BY SIDE
Bambu Lab TPU for AMS vs Prusament TPU 95A
From the Prusament TPU 95A review: Prusament specifies 95A hardness; Bambu TPU for AMS specifies 68D. Check the different hardness scales and feeding requirements.
Measured wins
| Spec | Bambu Lab TPU for AMS | Prusament TPU 95A |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Material | TPU | TPU |
| Manufacturer | Bambu Lab | Prusa Polymers |
| Diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Thermal | ||
| Print temp | 220 to 240°C | 220 to 240°C |
| Bed temp | 30 to 35°C | 55 to 75°C |
| Warping | Unknown | Unknown |
| Quality | ||
| Layer adhesion | Unrated | Unrated |
| Bed adhesion | Unrated | Unrated |
| Stringing resistance | Unrated | Unrated |
| Verdict | ||
| Overall rating | — | — |
| Price / kg | — | — |
How they differ on the data
Both list the same 220-240°C nozzle window, so one profile covers both. Prusament TPU 95A runs 32°C hotter on the bed (window midpoints 33°C and 65°C), and the windows do not overlap, so each needs its own profile. Prusament TPU 95A lists the wider window (20°C against 5°C).