DATASHEET · SIDE BY SIDE
Overture TPU 95A vs Polymaker PolyFlex TPU95
From the Overture TPU 95A review: PolyFlex is more consistent in diameter and feeds better on marginal extruders; Overture costs less and is fine on a direct drive.
Measured wins
| Spec | Overture TPU 95A | Polymaker PolyFlex TPU95 |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Material | TPU | TPU |
| Manufacturer | Overture | Polymaker |
| Diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Thermal | ||
| Print temp | 210 to 230°C | 210 to 230°C |
| Bed temp | 30 to 60°C | 25 to 60°C |
| Warping | none | none |
| Quality | ||
| Layer adhesion | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Bed adhesion | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Stringing resistance | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Verdict | ||
| Overall rating | 4.1/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Price / kg | — | — |
How they differ on the data
Both list the same 210-230°C nozzle window, so one profile covers both. Overture TPU 95A runs 2°C hotter on the bed (window midpoints 45°C and 43°C), and the two windows share 30°C of range, so one profile can cover both. Polymaker PolyFlex TPU95 lists the wider window (35°C against 30°C).
Overture TPU 95A ships on a 1 kg spool and Polymaker PolyFlex TPU95 on 0.75 kg, so compare price per kilogram rather than per spool.