DATASHEET · SIDE BY SIDE
eSUN eTPU-95A vs Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF
From the eSUN eTPU-95A review: Bambu HF prints far faster and feeds through an AMS; eSUN is the one to buy when you print flexibles occasionally and slowly.
Measured wins
| Spec | eSUN eTPU-95A | Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Material | TPU | TPU |
| Manufacturer | eSUN | Bambu Lab |
| Diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Thermal | ||
| Print temp | 220 to 250°C | 220 to 240°C |
| Bed temp | 45 to 60°C | 30 to 60°C |
| Warping | none | none |
| Quality | ||
| Layer adhesion | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Bed adhesion | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Stringing resistance | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Verdict | ||
| Overall rating | 4.2/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Price / kg | — | — |
How they differ on the data
eSUN eTPU-95A runs 5°C hotter on the nozzle (window midpoints 230°C and 235°C), and the two windows share 20°C of range, so one profile can cover both. eSUN eTPU-95A lists the wider window (30°C against 20°C). eSUN eTPU-95A runs 8°C hotter on the bed (window midpoints 45°C and 53°C), and the two windows share 15°C of range, so one profile can cover both. Bambu Lab TPU 95A HF lists the wider window (30°C against 15°C).