DATASHEET · SIDE BY SIDE
Overture TPU 95A vs eSUN eTPU-95A
From the Overture TPU 95A review: Two budget 95A spools with near-identical behaviour. eSUN has a marginally better surface, Overture better availability and a faster variant.
Measured wins
| Spec | Overture TPU 95A | eSUN eTPU-95A |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Material | TPU | TPU |
| Manufacturer | Overture | eSUN |
| Diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Thermal | ||
| Print temp | 210 to 230°C | 220 to 250°C |
| Bed temp | 30 to 60°C | 45 to 60°C |
| Warping | none | none |
| Quality | ||
| Layer adhesion | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Bed adhesion | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Stringing resistance | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Verdict | ||
| Overall rating | 4.1/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Price / kg | — | — |
How they differ on the data
eSUN eTPU-95A runs 15°C hotter on the nozzle (window midpoints 235°C and 220°C), and the two windows share 10°C of range, so one profile can cover both. eSUN eTPU-95A lists the wider window (30°C against 20°C). eSUN eTPU-95A runs 8°C hotter on the bed (window midpoints 53°C and 45°C), and the two windows share 15°C of range, so one profile can cover both. Overture TPU 95A lists the wider window (30°C against 15°C).