DATASHEET · SIDE BY SIDE
SUNLU PLA+ 2.0 vs eSUN PLA+
From the SUNLU PLA+ 2.0 review: The two are direct rivals. eSUN PLA+ has the longer track record and slightly better surface finish; SUNLU 2.0 flows better at high speed and is usually cheaper.
Measured wins
| Spec | SUNLU PLA+ 2.0 | eSUN PLA+ |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Material | PLA | PLA |
| Manufacturer | SUNLU | eSUN |
| Diameter | 1.75 mm | 1.75 mm |
| Thermal | ||
| Print temp | 205 to 220°C | 205 to 225°C |
| Bed temp | 50 to 60°C | 45 to 60°C |
| Warping | none | low |
| Quality | ||
| Layer adhesion | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Bed adhesion | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| Stringing resistance | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Verdict | ||
| Overall rating | 4.4/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Price / kg | — | — |
How they differ on the data
eSUN PLA+ runs 2°C hotter on the nozzle (window midpoints 215°C and 213°C), and the two windows share 15°C of range, so one profile can cover both. eSUN PLA+ lists the wider window (20°C against 15°C). SUNLU PLA+ 2.0 runs 2°C hotter on the bed (window midpoints 53°C and 55°C), and the two windows share 10°C of range, so one profile can cover both. eSUN PLA+ lists the wider window (15°C against 10°C).
Which one for the job
Pick eSUN PLA+ for everyday printing.
Pick SUNLU PLA+ 2.0 for display models.